Introduction
In the landscape of Spring applications, RestTemplate was once the standard for handling HTTP requests. However, with the advent of Spring 5, WebClient emerged as a modern, more capable alternative. This article provides a comprehensive comparison between WebClient and RestTemplate, detailing their advantages, disadvantages, usage examples, and unit tests to guide developers on when to use each.
RestTemplate
RestTemplate is a synchronous HTTP client historically favored by Spring developers for consuming RESTful web services.
Pros:
- Simplicity: RestTemplate offers a straightforward API for making synchronous HTTP requests.
- Familiarity: Many Spring developers are already comfortable using RestTemplate.
- Integration with Other Spring Features: RestTemplate works seamlessly with other Spring features like dependency injection.
Cons:
- Synchronous and Blocking: Each RestTemplate request blocks a thread until the response is received, which can limit scalability.
- Lack of Reactive Support: RestTemplate does not support reactive programming paradigms.
- Deprecated in Newer Versions: As of Spring 5, RestTemplate is deprecated in favor of the newer WebClient.
Example Usage:
RestTemplate restTemplate = new RestTemplate();
String result = restTemplate.getForObject("https://jsonplaceholder.typicode.com/posts/1", String.class);
RestTemplate Unit Test:
import org.junit.jupiter.api.Test;
import org.springframework.web.client.RestTemplate;
import static org.junit.jupiter.api.Assertions.*;
class RestTemplateTest {
@Test
void getRequest_ReturnsContent() {
RestTemplate restTemplate = new RestTemplate();
String result = restTemplate.getForObject("https://jsonplaceholder.typicode.com/posts/1", String.class);
assertTrue(response.getBody().contains("title"));
assertTrue(response.getStatusCode().is2xxSuccessful());
}
}
WebClient
Introduced in Spring 5, WebClient is a modern, reactive HTTP client that supports both synchronous and asynchronous requests.
Pros:
- Reactive: WebClient is built on Project Reactor, enabling reactive, non-blocking requests.
- Flexible: Supports both synchronous and asynchronous programming models.
- Fluent API: Provides a fluent, readable API for building requests.
- Superior Performance: The non-blocking model allows better resource utilization and concurrency.
Cons:
- Steep Learning Curve: Reactive programming can be challenging for developers new to the paradigm.
- Compatibility: Some 3rd-party libraries may not yet have full support for reactive types.
Example Usage:
WebClient webClient = WebClient.create("https://jsonplaceholder.typicode.com/posts/1");
Mono<String> result = webClient.get()
.retrieve()
.bodyToMono(String.class);
WebClient Unit Test:
import org.junit.jupiter.api.Test;
import org.springframework.web.reactive.function.client.WebClient;
import reactor.core.publisher.Mono;
import reactor.test.StepVerifier;
class WebClientTest {
@Test
void getRequest_ReturnsContent() {
WebClient webClient = WebClient.create("https://jsonplaceholder.typicode.com/posts/1");
Mono<String> result = webClient.get()
.retrieve()
.bodyToMono(String.class);
StepVerifier.create(result)
.expectNextMatches(content -> content.contains("title"))
.verifyComplete();
}
}
When to Use Each
- Use RestTemplate if:
- You are working on an existing Spring application built with RestTemplate.
- You need simple synchronous requests and do not require the benefits of reactive programming.
- You do not anticipate high concurrent load.
- Use WebClient if:
- You are building a new Spring application or microservice.
- You anticipate high traffic and need a scalable solution.
- You want to leverage the power of reactive programming for better performance and resource utilization.
- You require a mix of synchronous and asynchronous requests.
Comparison
| Feature | RestTemplate | WebClient |
|---|---|---|
| Operation Mode | Synchronous | Asynchronous (supports synchronous as well) |
| Blocking Nature | Blocking | Non-blocking |
| API Type | Traditional, imperative | Reactive, supports functional programming |
| Suitability for Scaling | Less suitable for high-load scenarios | Highly suitable for high-load scenarios |
| Ease of Use | Simple for basic use cases | Requires understanding of reactive programming |
| HTTP Methods Supported | All standard HTTP methods | All standard HTTP methods |
| Error Handling | Exception-based | Error handling through reactive streams |
| Request Handling | Direct handling of HTTP requests and responses | Declarative, composition-based approach |
| Thread Utilization | One thread per request/response cycle | Efficient thread utilization, minimal threads |
| Data Format Support | JSON, XML, and others | JSON, XML, and others |
| Community and Support | Mature, extensive community support | Growing community, modern support |
| Learning Curve | Lower, easier for beginners | Higher due to reactive concepts |
| Reactive Programming | Not supported | Fully supported |
| Deprecation Status | Deprecated in newer Spring versions | Actively developed and recommended for new projects |
| Performance | Adequate for many applications, but can be limiting in high concurrency environments | Optimized for performance in reactive and microservices environments |
| Testing | Straightforward with blocking calls | Requires reactive testing strategies |
| Integration with Spring | Deep integration with Spring Framework | Designed to integrate with Spring WebFlux |



